<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FWD/Forward &#187; recommended reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://disabledfeminists.com/category/recommended-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://disabledfeminists.com</link>
	<description>FWD (feminists with disabilities) for a way forward</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:50:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>FWD Retrospective Week: FWD Elsewhere Edition</title>
		<link>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/31/fwd-retrospective-week-fwd-elsewhere-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/31/fwd-retrospective-week-fwd-elsewhere-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[recommended reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabledfeminists.com/?p=4303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to FWD retrospective week! We&#8217;ve taking a look back at some of our favourite posts on a variety of themes over the next week. Anna: Bitch: I Promise You Haven&#8217;t Heard This One Before (or, the one where Anna completely loses it and goes hard-core bitter, oh my gosh) Once, not all that long [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to FWD retrospective week! We&#8217;ve taking a look back at some of our favourite posts on a variety of themes over the next week.</p>
<p>Anna:</p>
<p>Bitch: <a href="http://bitchmagazine.org/post/the-transcontinental-disability-choir-i-promise-you-havent-heard-this-one-before">I Promise You Haven&#8217;t Heard This One Before</a> (or, the one where Anna completely loses it and goes hard-core bitter, oh my gosh)</p>
<blockquote><p>Once, not all that long ago, there was a dramatic story to be told! And that dramatic story needed a villain. And not just any villain, but a truly evil, twisted villain, somehow marked as the villain. And since, as we all know, all listeners and viewers of all stories are normal &#8211; just like you and me! (I know you must be normal, because these stories always assume the listener is non-disabled, and we all know that disabled people aren&#8217;t normal, right?) &#8211; the best way to mark our villain is to make him one of those scary cripple-types. In fact, if we can give him, say, a hunched back, or some nasty facial scars, or a withered arm, or even &#8211; oh, here&#8217;s a great idea, let&#8217;s make him all wheelchair bound! &#8211; then everyone will know, just by looking at him, that our villain is evil in some way. And bitter about being crippled, because we all know people are bitter abut being crippled. In fact, let&#8217;s make our awesome crippled villain bent on the destruction of normal people (just like you and me!) because of how bitter he about being all crippled and stuff. Awesome. This story is totally original, and I will now make millions of dollars!</p></blockquote>
<p>Bitch: <a href="http://bitchmagazine.org/post/were-not-looking-for-pity-the-trouble-with-poster-children">We&#8217;re Not Looking For Pity: The Trouble with Poster Children</a> (Laura, I miss you.) [Note: This post discusses Autism Speaks]</p>
<blockquote><p>Instead, these campaigns reinforce the idea, as presented by Jerry Lewis himself, that people with disabilities are &#8220;half a person&#8221;, that they shouldn&#8217;t have a voice in their own campaigns &#8211; that they can&#8217;t have a voice that&#8217;s louder than &#8220;thank you for your nice support&#8221; That people with disabilities should be grateful for what they&#8217;re given, because otherwise their lives would continue to be pitiable and pathetic. That people with disabilities are all children, because having a disability is a death sentence.</p></blockquote>
<p>s.e. smith:</p>
<p><em>The Guardian: </em><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/aug/19/no-glee-for-disabled-people">No Glee for disabled people</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Shows that choose to depict disability are often praised for it, under the argument that any representation is a good representation, while the criticisms of disability rights activists are ignored. Even as we say that television shows are providing very harmful representations of disability, these shows are <a title="Disability Scoop: Glee Among TV Shows With Conscience For Highlighting Disabilities" href="http://www.disabilityscoop.com/2010/03/18/tv-awards/7365/">winning awards</a> for their handling of disability.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Bitch Magazine: </em><a href="http://bitchmagazine.org/post/pushback-at-the-intersections-its-sexytime-so-lets-get-it-on">Push(back) at the Intersections: It&#8217;s Sexytime, So Let&#8217;s Get It On</a></p>
<blockquote><p>When we <em>are</em> allowed to have sex in pop culture, it usually takes the form of a character with mental illness having sex because of the mental illness. I get this with Brenda Chenowith in <em>Six Feet Under</em>, where it&#8217;s suggested that she seeks out casual sex not because she&#8217;s an independent woman and she wants to, but because she&#8217;s desperately trying to fill some sort of hole in her life. I see this with other disabled and sexual characters as well; they&#8217;re not having sex in uncomplicated ways, because they want to or it&#8217;s fun or they are in long term relationships with people they love, but rather because they are mentally ill.</p></blockquote>
<p>Feministe: <a href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/06/14/so-like-whats-the-big-deal-with-transcripts-and-stuff-anyway/">So, Like, What&#8217;s The Big Deal With Transcripts And Stuff, Anyway?</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The thing about website accessibility is that the onus is often put on the people who need accommodations, instead of the people creating the site. That very word, ‘accommodations,’ makes it sound like one is the recipient of a <em>huge favour</em>; ‘we’re <em>accommodating</em> you.’ We need to break out of this mindset.</p></blockquote>
<p>this ain&#8217;t livin&#8217;: <a href="http://meloukhia.net/2010/08/psychiatrisation_a_great_way_to_silence_troublesome_women.html">Psychiatrisation: A Great Way To Silence Troublesome Women</a></p>
<blockquote><p>With the advent of psychiatry came an entirely new array of methods for oppressing women. Instead of keeping such women confined in the back rooms of the home, they could be sent to institutions! Women who engaged in ‘socially undesirable’ activity like lobbying for the right to vote, having children while single, being poor, and refusing to comply with orders from men could be handily dumped into institutions and left there.</p></blockquote>
<p>Annaham:</p>
<p>Ham.blog: <a href="http://annaham.net/2010/06/14/hidden-costs/">Hidden costs: On Lilith Fair and subtle exclusion</a></p>
<blockquote><p>In Lilith Fair’s super-woman-power-goddess universe, <em>women</em> with disabilities are left out, thereby not exactly contributing to LF’s supposed standing as a music festival For All Women. If you are leaving women with disabilities out, you are <em>leaving some women out </em>of your musical utopia. Certainly, accessibility policies will vary from venue to venue, but because LF is so huge and is of such note, I believe its coordinators have a responsibility to reach out to people who have, traditionally, been ignored, left out and/or forgotten about by major music festivals — and that group includes people — women — with disabilities.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ham.blog (<strong>note: </strong>old Blogspot location, at which comments are off): <a href="http://whotookthebomp.blogspot.com/2010/02/imbroglio-go-go.html">Imbroglio a Go-Go</a></p>
<blockquote><p>For some of us, <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/amandapalmer/status/9216040939">“suffering”</a> is part of the messy reality of life; when you have chronic pain (as I  do), that’s just the way it is sometimes. I cannot choose how, when or  where my pain will affect me, and “suffering” is often part of the  experience of living with pain, chronic illness or disability. And you <em>cannot</em> separate that suffering and that pain from the legacies of ableism,  privilege and exclusion that continue to affect how people with  disabilities are treated by many non-disabled people. As I’ve said  before, dealing with my own physical pain is often easier than dealing  with peoples’ opinions, attitudes and preconceived notions about my pain  or about people with disabilities as a whole. But those things still  affect and reinforce each other regardless.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Bitch</em> magazine&#8217;s Social Commentary blog: <a href="http://bitchmagazine.org/post/the-transcontinental-disability-choir-disability-archetypes-supercrip">Disability archetypes: Supercrip</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Unfortunately for some PWDs, Supercrip is a specter; he or she is a ghostly reminder of what we will never be—but, as some like to remind us, we should remember that Supercrips do “amazing” things, so why can’t we? Here’s why: Most people—disabled or not—cannot run marathons, or play sports at a non-amateur level, or [like Christopher Reeve has done] make advocating for stem-cell research into a full-time, publicity-garnering, and paying gig. However, some folks do not seem to realize this, and may deem it perfectly acceptable to dredge up the zombie-body of Supercrip, along with the magical, mythic Level Playing Field that supports her or him—and, by extension (and according to the non-marginalized) other people who have traditionally been marginalized.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Bitch</em> magazine&#8217;s Social Commentary blog: <a href="http://bitchmagazine.org/post/the-transcontinental-disability-choir-disabililty-chic-temporary-disability-in-lady-gagas-papar">Disability Chic? (Temporary) Disability in Lady Gaga&#8217;s &#8220;Paparazzi&#8221;</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The representation here lasts for less than a minute. Her temporarily-disabled status has also been caused by someone else: at the beginning of the clip, she is pushed off of a ledge by her partner as paparazzi photograph the two together, and she exacts her revenge at the clip&#8217;s end by poisoning him (while wearing a very confusing outfit that seems to take its inspiration from the Bee Girl in that Blind Melon video, Mickey Mouse, and Bjork). Are we supposed to pity her, since her disability has stemmed from her intimate partner&#8217;s actions? Should viewers side with one of the sensational newspaper headlines&#8211;&#8221;LADY NO MORE GAGA&#8221;&#8211;that appears right before the music begins, implying that she just isn&#8217;t as fabulous as she was before her dis-ablement?</p></blockquote>
<p>Chally</p>
<p>The Don&#8217;t DIS My ABILITY Blog: <a href="http://dontdismyability.wordpress.com/2010/11/24/it’s-your-fault/">It’s Your Fault!</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The thing is, people with a disability need accommodations. Accommodations aren’t optional extras, they aren’t something we can give up if we try a bit harder. Neither are we out to get all the money/spots/benefits at the expense of the rest of the population. We’re not just using the designated seating on the bus to annoy those who have to stand – and the accusatory glances are enough to wear one right down, let me tell you.</p></blockquote>
<p>The Don&#8217;t DIS My ABILITY Blog: <a href="http://dontdismyability.wordpress.com/2010/11/26/theres-respect-and-then-theres-respect/">There’s Respect, and Then There’s Respect</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>I’ve been thinking about how “respect” for people with disabilities is often framed in negative and condescending terms. We’re only worthy of respect insofar as we play the inspirational martyr. We can be respected for struggling through what are supposedly inevitably hopeless, helpless lives. But we can’t be respected for fighting back against the systemic barriers keeping us down, or questioning our care.</p></blockquote>
<p>abby jean:</p>
<p>Feministe: <a href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/04/05/fighting-ableism-fights-sexual-assault/">Fighting Ableism Fights Sexual Assault</a> [trigger warning]</p>
<blockquote><p>Thinking about all of this can leave me feeling rather powerless and hopeless. But then I remember that if the increased vulnerability of women with disabilities comes from the interlocking forces of sexism and ableism, all I have to do to combat this is continue fighting those forces wherever I encounter them. Even if not directly connected to social violence, fighting ableism helps undermine the messages which make women with disabilities more vulnerable.</p></blockquote>
<p>Bitch magazine: <a href="http://bitchmagazine.org/post/the-transcontinental-disability-choir-what-is-ableist-language-and-why-should-you-care">What is Ableism and Why Should You Care?</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Similarly, there is a plethora of words which rely on a shared assumption that to be disabled is inherently bad, inherently less than a person without a disability, inherently unworthy of attention, consideration, or care.</p></blockquote>
<p>&copy;2012 <a href="http://disabledfeminists.com">FWD/Forward</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/31/fwd-retrospective-week-fwd-elsewhere-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FWD Retrospective Week: Guest Posts Edition</title>
		<link>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/30/fwd-retrospective-week-guest-posts-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/30/fwd-retrospective-week-guest-posts-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 16:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[guest post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommended reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabledfeminists.com/?p=4302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to FWD retrospective week! We&#8217;ve taking a look back at some of our favourite posts on a variety of themes over the next week. Kaz: Disability and Asexuality Talking about the intersection of asexuality and disability is pretty difficult, because “asexuality” gets another meaning in disability rights discourse: it’s used to refer to the various [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to FWD retrospective week! We&#8217;ve taking a look back at some of our favourite posts on a variety of themes over the next week.</p>
<p>Kaz: <a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2009/11/06/guest-post-disability-and-asexuality/">Disability and Asexuality</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Talking about the intersection of <a href="http://www.asexuality.org/wiki/index.php?title=Asexuality">asexuality</a> and disability is pretty difficult, because “asexuality” gets another meaning in disability rights discourse: it’s used to refer to the various stereotypes about disabled people’s sexualities. People do often seem to realise that this is problematic when it’s pointed out to them. However, what not so many people realise off the bat is that it goes beyond just “problematic”.</p></blockquote>
<p>Atlasien: <a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2009/11/13/guest-post-sex-and-scoliosis/">Sex and Scoliosis</a></p>
<blockquote><p>I was harassed so much in the locker room my first year of middle school that I refused to change my clothes at all. P.E. was a living nightmare full of verbal attacks and physical threats from larger girls. I spent much of my time desperately thinking of ways I could get a medical excuse. Unfortunately, aside from my scoliosis, I was healthy as a horse. I refused to participate in activities anyway, and sat with the asthma-sidelined section. I’m still bitter about this experience because it taught me to associate healthy athleticism with emotional trauma and racist bullying. Maybe if I’d had my brace on, I could have gotten my coveted medical excuse.</p></blockquote>
<p>Diane Shipley: <a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/10/28/guest-post-stuck-and-tired/">Stuck and tired: How universities are failing disabled students (like me)</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Here’s where I point out something that should be obvious but seems not to be: when disabled students express a preference, it shouldn’t be brushed aside in favour of what administrative staff would prefer. Being assertive can be very difficult, especially in situations where someone has power over you. Expressing one’s needs can also be embarrassing, as many long-term illnesses and disabilities are stigmatised. It’s an issue that deserves to be treated with sensitivity, but too often isn’t.</p></blockquote>
<p>Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg: <a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/02/gp-i-do-not-suffer-from-autism/">I Do Not Suffer From Autism</a></p>
<blockquote><p>I suffer because I live within a social order that calculates human worth based on productivity and conformity.</p>
<p>I suffer because I live in a world that does not honor the gifts that autism brings me.</p>
<p>I suffer because I have learned to apologize for who I am.</p></blockquote>
<p>Amy Gravino:  <a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/10/19/guest-post-matchstick-girl/">Matchstick Girl</a></p>
<blockquote><p>But this was middle school, and there was no justice to be found. Not for anyone, but especially not for me. This continued all through high school, unrelenting, unending. I was, I thought, trapped in an invisible closet, one of my own making, unable to connect to anyone or anything. It is only years later that I now see how they were the ones truly in the dark.</p></blockquote>
<p>Jesse the K: <a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/09/15/guest-post-from-jesse-the-k-making-space-for-wheelchairs-and-scooters/">Making Space for Wheelchairs and Scooters</a></p>
<blockquote><p>There are many elements to making your event wheelchair-accessible. While U.S. law requires minimal wheelchair access, never rely on a venue’s general assertion of “oh yes, we’re accessible.” Those little wheelchair stickers? Anyone can buy them and post them at will, even at the bottom of a flight of steps.</p>
<p>There’s an entire shelf of 2-in (5,08 cm) thick books on this topic; so consider this the Twitter version.</p></blockquote>
<p>Lisa Harney: <a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/09/29/guest-post-from-lisa-invisible-ableism/">Invisible Ableism</a></p>
<blockquote><p>And this really was a spiral of self-hatred and recrimination that  continued until the past few months. That I was holding myself to  standards I had no idea I couldn’t attain without help, medication,  accommodations. That my knowledge of ADHD, the background <em>cultural knowledge</em> was so lacking in information that I really had no idea how to start  looking into this, or even that there was anything to look into. I spent  more time wishing I had done everything better, that I hadn’t made so  many mistakes, that I hadn’t lost two promising careers, that I hadn’t  apparently done everything in my power to block my own success.</p></blockquote>
<p>&copy;2012 <a href="http://disabledfeminists.com">FWD/Forward</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/30/fwd-retrospective-week-guest-posts-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FWD Retrospective Week: Policy Edition</title>
		<link>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/29/fwd-retrospective-week-policy-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/29/fwd-retrospective-week-policy-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommended reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabledfeminists.com/?p=4301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to FWD retrospective week! We&#8217;ve taking a look back at some of our favourite posts on a variety of themes over the next week. s.e. smith: Florida Court Ruling: Community-based Services, Not Institutionalisation Forced institutionalisation is not the only denial of rights and autonomy to people with disabilities that people think of as a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to FWD retrospective week! We&#8217;ve taking a look back at some of our favourite posts on a variety of themes over the next week.</p>
<p>s.e. smith:</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/07/01/florida-court-ruling-community-based-services-not-institutionalisation/">Florida Court Ruling: Community-based Services, Not Institutionalisation</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Forced institutionalisation is not the only denial of rights and autonomy to people with disabilities that people think of as a thing of the past and believe doesn’t need to be addressed, countered, or fought any more. As a result, when we attempt to have conversations about these very real, very structural, and very present issues, we meet rhetoric like ‘oh, well, that doesn’t happen anymore, right? It sure was sad when it did, though.’</p></blockquote>
<p>(Related: <a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/09/23/so-when-will-you-have-the-money/">So, When Will You Have the Money?</a>)</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/11/19/they-call-it-reverse-discrimination/">They Call it &#8216;Reverse Discrimination&#8217;</a></p>
<blockquote><p>People say this is ‘unequal treatment’ and that ‘if you want to be treated like everyone else, you need to be held to the same standard.’ What they miss is that<em> the standard is inherently discriminatory and biased. </em>Holding everyone to the same standard is effectively an act of discrimination, because it demands that people fit into a mold they can never fit into, reach goals they can never attain, because the deck is stacked against them from the start.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/08/10/crude-violations-bp-is-dumping-toxic-waste-in-low-income-communities-of-colour/">Crude Violations: BP Is Dumping Toxic Waste In Low Income Communities of Colour</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Given that this waste is supposedly ‘nontoxic,’ why were cleanup workers wearing protective suits? Given that this waste is supposedly ‘nontoxic,’ <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Wellness/bp-gulf-oil-spill-hazardous-health-risks-humans/story?id=10761677&amp;page=2">why are people who have been exposed to  it getting sick</a>? Given that this waste is supposedly ‘nontoxic,’ why is care being taken to ensure it doesn’t end up in privileged communities?</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/09/06/california-judge-says-state-of-california-is-still-providing-inadequate-health-services-to-inmates/">California Judge Says State of California Is Still Providing Inadequate Health Services to Inmates</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The findings of the report on California’s prisons recommend that the most effective way to improve access to health care for California inmates is to reduce the prison population by releasing inmates. Early release has already been promoted to deal with overcrowding as well as budget problems. However, we also need to approach this from the other side; it’s important not just to reduce the prison population, but to put fewer people in prison in the first place. This requires a major overhaul of California’s mandatory sentencing laws and approach to law enforcement, both of which are long overdue.</p></blockquote>
<p>Annaham:</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/04/23/sit-lie-laws/">Why SF&#8217;s Proposed Sit/Lie Laws are a Terrible Idea</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The intersections with disability here are rather clear. For one thing, there are some intersections between homelessness and disability, because some homeless people are, for example, mentally ill or have disabling physical problems. Do either of these things make them unworthy of compassion, or <em>not</em> human? Of course not, but from the way this proposed ordinance is designed, it is, on a very basic level, criminalizing homelessness even more than it is already criminalized (not to mention socially stigmatized), while taking extra “common sense” steps to avoid citing non-homeless people for an offense.</p></blockquote>
<p>Anna:</p>
<p><a href = "http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/05/28/its-always-more-complicated-the-justified-abortion/">It&#8217;s Always More Complicated: The &#8220;Justified&#8221; Abortion</a> (I have snuck this in under policy even though it doesn&#8217;t really fit.)</p>
<blockquote><p>I deeply resent the way anti-choice advocates point at people with disabilities and talk about how they’ll all be eliminated if we allow abortion-on-demand. The sheer amount of hate directed at Don when he goes to pro-choice rallies by the anti-choice contingent, because they see him as a traitor to their cause, is amazing to me.</p>
<p>And yet, many pro-choice advocates also use people with disabilities as pawns in these so-called debates. They hold up stories of fetal abnormalities as “justified abortion”, as the acceptable test-case, the one they know the general public is likely to agree with. I see no analysis, no discussion, of the ableist nature of this narrative. It’s an acceptable justified abortion because the fetus was abnormal, and who wants a broken child that’s going to ruin everyone’s life?</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/09/23/the-canadian-government-is-going-to-court-so-they-dont-have-to-make-web-content-accessible-to-screen-readers/">The Canadian Government Is Going To Court So They Don&#8217;t Have To Make Web Content Accessible To Screen Readers</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Now, I Am Not A Lawyer, and it’s been about 10 years since I studied the Charter, so I’m going to leave that out there and not discuss my personal interpretations because they don’t matter. What matters is two things: 1) What the court says and 2) That the Federal Government is arguing that they shouldn’t have to be accessible to screen readers in court.</p>
<p>The latter is, of course, being read as Jodhan wasting tax payers money in a frivolous lawsuit, not the Federal Government for refusing to have accessible content.</p></blockquote>
<p>Follow-up: <a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/11/30/win-federal-court-orders-canadian-government-to-make-websites-accessible-to-screen-readers/">WIN!: Federal Court Orders Canadian Government To Make Websites Accessible To Screen Readers!</a></p>
<p>Lauredhel</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/01/04/backscatter-x-ray-scanners-security-theatre-and-marginalised-bodies/">Backscatter X-ray scanners, security theatre, and marginalised bodies</a></p>
<blockquote><p>If anyone believes airline security operators for a second when it comes to future commitments to respect the privacy of airline travellers? I’ve a harbour bridge I’d like to sell you. [...] I give it 24 hours before clandestine mobile phone images of travellers with marginalised bodies show up on the Internet.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2009/10/19/barriers-to-justice-when-rapists-attack-women-with-disabilities-australian-report/">Barriers to justice when rapists attack women with disabilities: Australian report</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Caroline uses a communication book to communicate, but her communication book did not have the vocabulary she needed to describe what had happened to her.</p></blockquote>
<p>kaninchenzero:</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/06/03/where-about-us-but-without-us-leads/">Where About Us But Without Us Leads</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Make no mistake, the assistance provided in assisted outpatient treatment is the armed force of the state ensuring that persons who fall under the purview of this law and those like it comply with any and all aspects of the court-ordered treatment plan. Assisted outpatient treatment is strictly from <em>Minority Report</em> — the person needs have no actual history of violence and need not be judged to be in immanent danger of harming ouself or others.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/03/10/we-need-to-consider-more-than-universities-2/">We Need to Consider More than Universities</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Because predators aren’t just at universities and colleges. All those uni students will leave school eventually. Not all predators even go to uni. They will all be looking for targets. Not only will they choose targets that are vulnerable and have a low risk of incurring negative consequences, they will seek out environments where there are large concentrations of their preferred targets. They will search for jobs where they will be in positions of authority over those targets. Predators that prefer children try to get jobs in schools or in religious settings. Predators that prefer disabled people, mentally ill people, or elderly people look for work in hospitals and supportive care facilities. Predators that prefer sex workers become pimps or police.</p></blockquote>
<p>abby jean:</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/10/12/i-love-policy/">I Love Policy</a></p>
<blockquote><p>At the end of the day, though, policy is literally life and death. Whether a mentally ill teenager gets tased or shot by a police officer depends on law enforcement policy, training, and management. Whether a PWD can afford and access the medications and equipment they require to live. Policy determines how and why and for how long and under what circumstances people are institutionalized. Whether and how they are protected from abuse and neglect from caretakers and family. Whether and when and how they have children.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/10/19/institutional-research-boards-syphilis-and-you/">Institutional Research Boards, Syphilis, and You!</a></p>
<blockquote><p>So have we created the right policy? The best policy? A good policy? I don’t know. Our review of the policy gave us only a little bit of answer and a whole lot of questions. It turns out that’s often how policy works, and the kinds of problems with this policy are the same kinds of problems we see in a lot of policies. There’s the problem of specificity – how do you write a policy that says exactly what you want? There’s the problem of implementation – how do you get people to do what the policy says? And then there’s the problem of enforcement – how do you make sure that people are really following the policy? It’s easy to make sure that the rules apply to the most extreme examples – the Guatemalas, and Tuskegees, the<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment">Milgrams</a> and the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment">Stanford Prison Experiments</a> – but it’s harder to address the cases nearer the line between ok and not ok.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/08/05/vulnerability-indexes-homelessness-and-disability/">Vulnerability Indexes, Homelessness, and Disability</a></p>
<blockquote><p>I strongly support these programs and have been very excited to see them gaining traction in LA. (we have project 50 in downtown LA, project 30 in the San Fernando Valley, and others pending right now.) I also think these programs are of special interest from a disability perspective because of the extremely high prevalence rates of mental and physical disabilities among the long-term chronic homeless, and the way these disabilities make it difficult, if not impossible, for this group of homeless people to move towards stable permanent housing.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/08/17/predatory-lending-and-health-services/">Predatory Lending and Health Services</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Nothing like being billed $15,000 at 13.9% interest for a medical procedure you did not sign up for and for which you had no actual medical need!</p></blockquote>
<p>&copy;2012 <a href="http://disabledfeminists.com">FWD/Forward</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/29/fwd-retrospective-week-policy-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FWD Retrospective Week: Accessibility Edition</title>
		<link>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/28/fwd-retrospective-week-accessibility-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/28/fwd-retrospective-week-accessibility-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommended reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabledfeminists.com/?p=4300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to FWD retrospective week! We&#8217;ve taking a look back at some of our favourite posts on a variety of themes over the next week. s.e. smith: Accessibility Policies Done Right: The Legion of Honor in San Francisco I think that this policy really speaks to the amount of activism which the disability community has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to FWD retrospective week! We&#8217;ve taking a look back at some of our favourite posts on a variety of themes over the next week.</p>
<p>s.e. smith:</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/03/01/accessibility-policies-done-right-the-legion-of-honor-in-san-francisco/">Accessibility Policies Done Right: The Legion of Honor in San Francisco</a></p>
<blockquote><p>I think that this policy really speaks to the amount of activism which the disability community has been involved in across the Bay Area. In Berkeley in particular, people with disabilities have been very active and very outspoken and have played a major role in shaping policy and pushing for accessibility. The Legion of Honor’s policy isn’t the result of forward-thinking museum employees, it’s the result of pressure from the community and efforts to increase awareness of disability issues.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/10/12/accessibility-is-so-much-more-than-ramps/">Accessibility Is So Much More Than Ramps</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Considerations about accessibility and accessible spaces should be on the forefront of the mind of <em>anyone </em>tasked with building, arranging, or coordinating a space, not just people who need accommodations, and people need to expand the way they think about accessibility, actively seek out and solicit information to make the spaces they control better. People often seem to think that accessibility is something you add when someone asks for it, which presumes that people with disabilities will always ask for it, when instead, more commonly, we go ‘oh, that space isn’t accessible or there’s not clear information about accessibility, so I won’t bother attending that event.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/07/07/im-disabled-and-i-vote/">I&#8217;m Disabled and I Vote</a></p>
<blockquote><p>An estimated 20% of the population of the United States is disabled. That’s a pretty big percentage of the electorate. Given that we are not actually a hivemind, it’s safe to assume that we have some very diverse views on politics and that those of us who do vote probably vote very differently. Those of us who can’t vote would vote differently as well, if they were given an opportunity to do so. It’s important to make sure that these voices are heard, to ensure that votes are cast not only by people who can walk up the stairs to a polling place, stand at a polling booth, and interact with a touchscreen or paper ballot, but by <em>everyone.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>lauredhel</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/03/11/am-j-cardiol-concern-trolling-but-mobility-aids-will-stop-them-exercising/">Am J Cardiol concern-trolling: “But mobility aids will stop them EXERCISING!”</a></p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Researchers are urging doctors to consider the risks of scooter use before making recommendations to patients invest in a scooter.</p></blockquote>
<p>“*Doubletake*”, thought I. “Doctors should consider the risks? Doctors? Not, say, people with disabilities? Just doctors? Doctors should weigh up the risks before offering any options at all? Doctors should decide?”</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2009/12/15/its-a-scooter-not-a-mack-truck/">It’s a scooter, not a Mack truck</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Something I’ve noticed a lot since starting to drive a scooter is how TERRIFIED people are.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2009/10/17/activism-suggestion-how-about-shade-for-accessible-parking-spots/">Activism suggestion: How about shade for “accessible” parking spots?</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Parked cars in the Australian sun get way too hot at the best of times, no matter how able-bodied you are. But lots of people with disabilities have further issues with temperature regulation and/or high temperatures making them sick. People with spinal injuries can have major issues keeping their body temperature stable. People with multiple sclerosis can be made very ill very suddenly by overheating. People with CFS or fibro can have similar issues with temperature regulation or overheating. Head injuries or Parkinson’s disease or stroke or diabetes or lung cancer or extensive burns scars or who take certain medications can all reduce a person’s ability to stay safe in the heat.</p></blockquote>
<p>Anna:</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/11/05/accessibility-is-not-an-individual-problem/">Accessibility is not an individual problem</a></p>
<blockquote><p>We don’t act like putting a door in the front of our building is a favour we are doing. We assume that doors are necessary. And yet, people treat having a ramp to that door as a favour they are doing, when the ramp serves the same purpose: it allows people to come inside.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/10/28/politicians-care-so-much-they-make-their-message-nonsense/">Politicians Care So Much They Make Their Message Nonsense</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Every political party in Canada “cares” about “the disabled”. They really do. Each one has a little subsection of their website dedicated to explaining how they “care” about “the disabled”.</p>
<p>I think it would be awesome instead of telling me how much they cared, they’d show it. And one way of doing that would be subtitling their ads, so everyone can know what their message is.</p></blockquote>
<p>abby jean:</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/11/16/how-can-we-get-more-bilingual-health-care-providers/">How Can We Get More Bilingual Health Providers?</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The report lists 39 distinct languages and almost 10,000 residents speak another language not on the list. About 29% of county residents are Limited English Proficient (LEP), which means they have some degree of difficulty communicating in English. All of these people will have some contact with the health care system at some point in their lives and ideally, at more than one point.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/02/24/shame-and-blame-with-african-americans-and-mental-health-let-the-circle-be-unbroken/">Shame and Blame with African-Americans and Mental Health: Let the Circle be Unbroken</a></p>
<blockquote><p>To me, all of this suggests that the psychiatric profession hasn’t really figured out how to provide psychiatric treatment and care of the African-American population with the African-American individual’s best interests in mind. History speaks to using psychiatry to control, torture, sedate, and oppress African-Americans, even creating fictionalized diagnoses to help support the structures of slavery.</p></blockquote>
<p>&copy;2012 <a href="http://disabledfeminists.com">FWD/Forward</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/28/fwd-retrospective-week-accessibility-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FWD Retrospective Week: Pop Culture Edition</title>
		<link>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/27/fwd-retrospective-week-pop-culture-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/27/fwd-retrospective-week-pop-culture-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 16:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[media and pop culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommended reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabledfeminists.com/?p=4299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to FWD retrospective week! We&#8217;ve taking a look back at some of our favourite posts on a variety of themes over the next week. s.e. smith: Hipster Ableism Hipster -ism is a type of humour which people use because they mistakenly identify it as edgy and transgressive. The idea is that it’s funny because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to FWD retrospective week! We&#8217;ve taking a look back at some of our favourite posts on a variety of themes over the next week.</p>
<p>s.e. smith:</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2009/11/05/hipster-ableism/">Hipster Ableism</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Hipster -ism is a type of humour which people use because they mistakenly identify it as edgy and transgressive. The idea is that it’s funny because it’s pushing social boundaries and norms. Indeed, it’s a way of thumbing one’s nose at the “PC police.” But, there are a few things about it which suggest that this is not the case.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2009/10/24/where-are-all-the-people-with-disabilities/">Where Are All the People With Disabilities?</a></p>
<blockquote><p>I want to see people like me when I look at the television. It’s why I watch, to escape into a magical world that I think I might be able to inhabit. And it’s easier for me, as a viewer, to place myself in that world when I see people like me. I think a lot of people feel like this. There’s a distance involved when you can’t connect with any of the characters, experientally.</p></blockquote>
<p>Anna:</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2009/11/05/and-if-this-keeps-up-there-wont-be-any/">And If This Keeps Up There Won&#8217;t Be Any</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Gosh, I wonder why there aren’t any Big Name Child Actresses who are d/Deaf or blind (or both) and can thus play Helen Keller. Do you think it’s because there aren’t enough roles that are given to such actresses so they can develop a name for themselves? Do you think it’s because any roles that could be given to a d/Deaf or blind actress are given to non-disabled actresses? Do you think there might be some sort of bias going on in casting decisions that might be impacting this at all?</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2009/11/16/glee-thats-why-we-call-it-dismissing-legitimate-concerns-instead-of-acting/">Glee: &#8220;That&#8217;s Why We Call It Dismissing Legitimate Concerns instead of Acting&#8221;</a></p>
<blockquote><p>That’s right, suddenly, with no history of protest whatsoever, people with disabilities were complaining about the show! Just days before it aired its Very Special Disability Episode, “Wheels”! Who would have imagined!</p>
<p>Or, more accurately, people with disabilities have been talking about issues with the show since the first trailers hit the internet, with incisive commentary after the first episode was aired, but this only became of interest just a few days before the show wanted everyone to see how “serious” they were.</p></blockquote>
<p>Annaham:</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/09/5-ridiculous-big-pharma-ads/">5 Ridiculous Big Pharma Ads</a></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Lyrica:</strong> Every time I see this one, I want to yell at the TV, particularly when the one featuring the classy middle-aged lady who bakes bread has somehow made its hellish way into my precious rerun of <em>Dirty Jobs</em> or another show that I don’t like to admit to enjoying. The actress in this ad pronounces “Fibromyalgia” like it’s a seasonal root vegetable or something (like “FYE-bro-MY-al-GEE-AH”) and all I can do is give the television my most hateful death glare. Oh, and even better is when she says that “My doctor diagnosed it as FYE-bro-MY-al-GEE-AH muscle pain,” and I want to scream, “Lady, IF YOU <em>KNEW</em> what fibro was actually like, you would not be saying that. You would probably be in too much pain on some days to do very much.”</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/06/07/kids-these-days/">Kids These Days! The &#8220;Generation Y&#8221; Panic, Privilege, and Erasure</a></p>
<blockquote><p>They don’t know how to dress professionally! They expect to march into the workplace of their choice and immediately start making a six figure-salary! They think they are perfect! They want praise <em>all of the time</em>! They have tattoos, dyed hair, and iPods! EVERYBODY PANIC, because the American workplace is apparently going to be dragged down by Generation Y’s entitlement, narcissism and laziness! This narrative, however, seems to apply mostly to a very specific subset of the population (and even the picture that accompanies the NYT article reinforces this): young, able-bodied, middle to upper-middle class, college-educated white people.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/08/28/liberal-ableism/">Liberal Ableism</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Ableism is there when a liberal makes “jokes” about a condition or conditions that ou does not have, such as Restless Leg Syndrome. Or OCD. Or depression. Or schizophrenia. Or chronic fatigue syndrome. Or mental disabilities. Often, these “harmless” jokes are made at the direct expense of people with disabilities or health conditions — both physical and mental. Ableism is there when someone insinuates that diet changes (EAT ORGANIC!!11) and exercise (What? You mean you DON’T work out <em>every day</em>?!) are <em>the solution</em> to all bodily problems, including disabilities, mental health issues, and chronic health conditions. It’s there when someone calls those on the opposite side of the political spectrum “insane.”</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/02/09/evelyn-evelyn-ableism-ableism/">Evelyn Evelyn: Ableism Ableism?</a> (see also: <a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/02/22/a-few-words-on-some-previous-words/">Who Killed Civil Discourse? Evelyn Evelyn, Marginalization, and Internet Discussion</a>)</p>
<blockquote><p>Unfortunately, Evelyn Evelyn seems like a project that is far from actually <em>being</em> transgressive, even given the initial appearance of said transgression (because what’s more <em>shocking</em> and <em>weird</em> than conjoined twins, at least according to abled culture?). The project, as far as I can tell, makes no reference to the ways in which actual people with disabilities are treated in Western culture; this probably seems like a tall order for any musical project, but there is a chasm of difference between at least <em>acknowledging</em> that there are people like this (in this case, conjoined twins) who do exist and that they probably are affected by ableism, and outright appropriation of this <em>uniqueness</em> in the name of art.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2009/10/21/the-negative-side-of-positive-thinking/">The Negative Side of Positive Thinking</a></p>
<blockquote><p>This type of philosophy places an untoward emphasis on the individual: <em>You</em> control <em>your</em> reality. <em>You</em> control what happens to you. <em>You</em> control how much money you make. <em>You</em> deserve the best. Solving problems or helping others is beneath <em>you</em>, because it is all about <em>you</em>. <em>You’ve</em> got the world on a string, (sittin’ on a rainbow!) and it’s <em>yours</em> for the taking. Why help others, when <em>you</em> can just attract everything <em>you</em> want with your thoughts?</p></blockquote>
<p>lauredhel</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2009/10/29/law-order-dignity-worth-and-the-medical-model-of-disability/">Law &amp; Order: “Dignity”, Worth, and the Medical Model of Disability</a></p>
<blockquote><p>To that list of marginalised groups, of people who are often denied truly informed and supported choices, we can perhaps add – people pregnant with fetuses who may have a prenatal diagnosis of a disability. [...] As a feminist, I believe that we can have the abortion-rights conversation without marginalising, othering, and disparaging people with disabilities.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/02/17/saying-conjoined-twins-are-disabled-is-insulting-evelyn-evelyn-redux/">“Saying conjoined twins are disabled is insulting!”: Evelyn Evelyn, redux</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Because disability can be all of these things, and none of these things. Disability isn’t a checklist, or a fixed point. Disability – and normalcy – are socially constructed. Disability is the interaction between a characteristic or a group of characteristics often called “impairments”, and a world that recognises people with these characteristics as abnormal.</p></blockquote>
<p>Chally<br />
<a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2009/12/23/talking-down-disability-while-talking-down-to-young-people/"><br />
Talking down disability while talking down to young people</a></p>
<blockquote><p>What stories like this do is assume an abled readership. At least, I hope so, because consciously putting all this stuff onto young disabled people is a bit much. If a good part of writing fantasy/SF/spec for young people is to assist them in escaping and building up their imaginations and experiences, where are disabled youth to live out fantasy lives? Disabled youth are quite as deserving of an imaginative playground in which to develop their minds and thought as anyone else. In fact, I think it’s particularly vital that people so marginalised in the world be given opportunities to work at rich internal lives.</p></blockquote>
<p>&copy;2012 <a href="http://disabledfeminists.com">FWD/Forward</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/27/fwd-retrospective-week-pop-culture-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FWD Retrospective Week: Reviews Edition</title>
		<link>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/26/fwd-retrospective-week-reviews/</link>
		<comments>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/26/fwd-retrospective-week-reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 16:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[recommended reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabledfeminists.com/?p=4298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to FWD retrospective week! We&#8217;ve taking a look back at some of our favourite posts on a variety of themes over the next week. Annaham: Film Review: HBO&#8217;s &#8220;Kevorkian&#8221; The entire film is framed by Kevorkian’s ill-fated 2008 bid for a congressional seat representing the state of Michigan –  his platform, as the film [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to FWD retrospective week! We&#8217;ve taking a look back at some of our favourite posts on a variety of themes over the next week.</p>
<p>Annaham:</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/07/08/film-review-kevorkian/">Film Review: HBO&#8217;s &#8220;Kevorkian&#8221;</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The entire film is framed by Kevorkian’s ill-fated 2008 bid for a congressional seat representing the state of Michigan –  his platform, as the film shows it, leans heavily on the Ninth Amendment — but his congressional hopes are not the most interesting or thought-provoking part of the film. Almost paradoxically, the most interesting part of this documentary is the fact that Kevorkian does a pretty excellent job of <em>not</em> coming across as particularly sympathetic, something that a viewer might not glean from the film’s trailer.</p></blockquote>
<p>lauredhel</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/03/01/defiant-birth-impolite-women-who-didnt-make-history/">“Defiant Birth”: Impolite Women Who Didn’t Make History</a></p>
<blockquote><p>All of the women in the book have chosen to continue pregnancies against medical advice. The medical advice is based on something about the pregnancy falling outside of the very narrow “norm” – the women’s disabilities, their “elderly” ages, a diagnosis (or misdiagnosis) of a fetus labelled “defective”.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/01/20/seven-reactions-to-reviews-of-rachel-axlers-smudge/">Seven reactions to reviews of Rachel Axler’s “Smudge”</a></p>
<blockquote><p>3. Having a child with a disability isn’t an “unthinkable” “nightmarish” experience with a “monster”. See point one.</p></blockquote>
<p>Anna</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2009/10/19/television-bloody-torchwood/">Bloody Torchwood</a></p>
<blockquote><p>All I can think of is the complete ignorance of the experiences of families with disabilities, whose children do scream and scream and scream, or do some other harming activity, because of their disability, and their parents love them anyway. I think about how this is another episode of television that’s used a person with a disability as a way for the non-disabled to learn something about themselves.</p>
<p>I think about how they decided disability and deformity would be their stand-in for horrible and unimaginable.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2009/10/12/television-disability-joan-of-arcadia/">Disability &amp; Television: Joan of Arcadia</a></p>
<blockquote><p>This what portraying disability in a “positive” light looks like to me. Making Kevin totally cool with everything that had happened, ignoring the way that families heal after sudden and unexpected changes, would be dismissing the realities of so many people. Showing Kevin as some sort of prop to Joan’s growing self-awareness would be insulting, and he obviously has his own story-line and things he needs to deal with. He doesn’t need to be a hero, or good at everything he tries. He just needs to be a person.</p></blockquote>
<p>Chally</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/01/03/film-review-beyond-words/">Film Review: Beyond Words</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The two main, unnamed characters in the film are a deaf woman (Charlotte Gregg) and a blind man (Gyton Grantley). The film alternates between their perspectives, which makes for interesting (and probably not absolutely fantastic, but I’ll get to that) viewing/listening. During the deaf character’s parts, the sound adjusts to fit her perspective, and during the blind character’s parts, the visuals adjust to his.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2009/11/29/some-thoughts-on-the-time-travelers-wife/">Some Thoughts on The Time Traveler’s Wife</a></p>
<blockquote><p>But what I found most strange in the discrepancy between the book and the film was Henry’s attitude. In the book, Henry is largely miserable once he loses his legs. In the film, Henry is a Good Cripple. It’s a pretty big contrast, and again the film takes out emotional complexity and loses the opportunity to highlight the marginal.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/07/30/book-review-wicked-by-gregory-maguire/"><br />
Book Review: Wicked by Gregory Maguire</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Look, there’s lots I could talk about in this review: what I found to be a half-baked treatment of race, the truly gorgeous worldbuilding, many “what the pancake” moments, some of the most rounded characters I’ve found in fiction. But I think the treatment of Elphaba’s sister, Nessarose, in terms of her being disabled, needs a whole review to itself.</p></blockquote>
<p>&copy;2012 <a href="http://disabledfeminists.com">FWD/Forward</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/26/fwd-retrospective-week-reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FWD Retrospective Week: Disability Narratives Edition</title>
		<link>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/25/fwd-retrospective-week-disability-narratives-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/25/fwd-retrospective-week-disability-narratives-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 16:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[recommended reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabledfeminists.com/?p=4297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to FWD retrospective week! We&#8217;ve taking a look back at some of our favourite posts on a variety of themes over the next week. Anna: Lucky for us, there&#8217;s money to be thrown One of the many, many things that bothers me about disability &#38; accessibility is how many of the problems can be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to FWD retrospective week! We&#8217;ve taking a look back at some of our favourite posts on a variety of themes over the next week.</p>
<p>Anna:</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2009/10/09/lucky-for-us-theres-money-to-be-thrown/">Lucky for us, there&#8217;s money to be thrown</a></p>
<blockquote><p>One of the many, many things that bothers me about disability &amp; accessibility is how many of the problems can be solved by throwing money at them.</p></blockquote>
<p>kaninchenzero:</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2009/12/08/i-hope-you-feel-better/">I  Hope You Feel Better</a></p>
<blockquote><p>I have a chronic disease that isn’t curable and I have not heard of it going into remission. This is not <em>temporary</em>. Sometimes the symptoms are excruciating. Sometimes the symptoms aren’t so bad. They never go away. Even if I never feel any better than I do right now my life will still be worth living and I’ll still be happy and I’ll be okay because I work really hard at living my life and being as happy as I can in it. For me it includes accepting that I will not get better. It also includes some complaining about feeling rotten because accepting that I won’t get better doesn’t turn it into rainbow-flavored unicorn shit.</p></blockquote>
<p>s.e. smith:</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/08/16/working-towards-the-neutral-place/">Working Towards the Neutral Place</a></p>
<blockquote><p>It’s about creating a space for everyone, a space where people can self identify how they like, and feel the way they like, without being judged or shamed not just by society, but also by fellow people with disabilities. There is room for all identities and lines of thought in a world where disability is a neutral identity, and people are allowed to shape it and feel about it the way they want to, rather than being pressured to perform, think, and believe in a particular way for the benefit of others.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/04/19/whose-voices/">Whose Voices?</a></p>
<blockquote><p>It’s not that our voices aren’t out there. It’s not that it’s impossible to find people with disabilities to write about disability and to write about their experiences. It’s that our voices are rarely centred beyond the disability community. We are rarely asked, for example, to write about our own disability for the <em>Washington Post. </em>We are rarely profiled by the <em>Daily Mail. </em>The media wants to talk to the people who live and work with us, with our friends, but they do not want to talk to us.</p></blockquote>
<p>Annaham</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/10/07/teeny-little-super-meta/">Teeny Little Super-Meta: The things I can&#8217;t write about</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Writing publicly about these things, on the other hand, may get me comments that I do not particularly want to face. <em>This could not have happened.</em><em> How do we know you’re not just making this up? Do you always have to write about yourself? Let’s look at this <strong>objectively</strong>. Why can’t you focus on something more important? I’m sure they didn’t mean it <strong>like that</strong>. Why can’t you just <strong>let it go</strong>? It was so long ago, anyway. We all have difficulties, what makes you so special? Who do you think you are?</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/08/07/just/">Just</a></p>
<blockquote><p>There are a lot of people who seem to subscribe to the “just-world” theory of events — that is, anyone who has anything bad happen to them has done something to “deserve” it. One sees this attitude thrown around quite a bit in relation to disability and illness — for the smoker who gets lung cancer, for some people who become severely disabled due to accidents, for the “angry” or “repressed” person who is diagnosed with a deadly illness. One sees it in so-called New Age “theories” of illness — that illness is a physical manifestation of bad karma or some other buzz-word often appropriated from a non-Western belief system.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/09/19/reactions-part-two/">Reactions, part two: Social aspects</a></p>
<blockquote><p>In that interaction lies one of the most crucial issues regarding the way many people with disabilities are treated: Those of us with potentially life-threatening health conditions are never to be trusted. Those of us with chronic health conditions are never to be trusted. Those of us with disabilities must be faking it to get attention, to gain the upper hand in whatever way we can. We <em>must</em> be using our conditions as <em>excuses</em> to get pity from those close to us, or from anyone, really. We must be faking — things can’t really be <em>that</em> bad. That dire. That frightening to us and those who are close to us.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/05/02/educate-yourself/">Go educate yourself (please!)</a></p>
<blockquote><p>For me personally, the willingness that I “should” have to help well-meaning folks learn is also an energy issue. I am a person with disabilities, several of which I have written about at length on this website — and one of which is a pain condition subject to flare-ups. Thus, I have to manage my time and energy extremely carefully. Having to explain basic concepts over and over again to strangers on the internet because they’ve deigned to tell me that they “want” to learn — and some of whom may think, by extension, that they are somehow entitled to my time and energy — takes <em>work</em>. Writing takes work; additionally, a lot of bloggers do the blogging and responding to comments thing <em>for free</em>, on their own time.</p></blockquote>
<p>lauredhel</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2009/11/03/reclamation-thoughts-from-a-fat-hairy-uppity-lame-bitch/">Reclamation: thoughts from a fat hairy uppity lame bitch</a></p>
<blockquote><p>This post started with me suggesting a FAQ on reclamation for the “Finally, a Feminism 101 Blog” blog: “But there’s a whole feminist magazine called Bitch and a book called The Ethical Slut, so why can’t I call you a slutty bitch?”</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/02/19/for-cereal-jessica-at-jezebel-ptsd-after-obstetric-assault-is-hysterical/">For Cereal, Jessica at Jezebel? PTSD after obstetric assault is “hysterical”?</a></p>
<p>[WARNING: descriptions of obstetric rape and PTSD]</p>
<p>Chally:</p>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/02/01/only-you-know-your-own-experience/">Only you know your own experience</a></p>
<blockquote><p>I’m telling you this story so you know something very important. Medical professionals are people, with their own biases and experiences. Sometimes they will make mistakes and the wrong judgments. They will try to fit you into convenient boxes, tell you things about yourself that just aren’t true.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/01/19/disability-is-not-your-analogy/">Disability is not your analogy</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Disability is not your cute fun analogy. You know why? Disability is its own thing all by itself. Disability is a part of many people’s lives and identities, it’s an experience in the world, a political one, a personal one, a sensitive one, a serious one. It is not a sweet little term you can charmingly appropriate for whatever other purpose pops into your head.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2009/11/09/limits/">Limits</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Those are your limits: you cannot understand people like us outside of your framework. You are trying to limit us with your ideas of who we can be.</p>
<p>I will not fit your limited narrative. I tell my own story, giving shape to my own experience.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/08/12/on-centring-caregivers-in-disability-discourse/">On Centring Caregivers in Disability Discourse</a></p>
<blockquote><p>It’s really off-putting when a group of disabled people are trying to have a conversation and a caregiver butts in with “you’re wrong. I know, because I care for someone with such and such a disability”. This makes me squirm. Even worse are those disability organisations or charities that have only parents and caregivers on their boards. “Oh, but it’s all right, my brother has this condition. In fact, we all have family members with this condition!”</p></blockquote>
<p>&copy;2012 <a href="http://disabledfeminists.com">FWD/Forward</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/25/fwd-retrospective-week-disability-narratives-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recommended Reading for 24 December, 2010</title>
		<link>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/24/recommended-reading-for-24-december-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/24/recommended-reading-for-24-december-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 02:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bad advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommended reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disabled sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traveling while disabled]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabledfeminists.com/?p=4364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gentle reader, be cautioned: comments sections on mainstream media sites tend to not be safe and we here at FWD/Forward don’t necessarily endorse all the opinions in these pieces. Let’s jump right in, shall we? The Broken of Britain: The GP’s Story by Dr Jest So there you have it. Neither Pete nor Dud would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gentle reader, be cautioned: comments sections on mainstream media sites tend to not be safe and we here at FWD/Forward don’t necessarily endorse all the opinions in these pieces. Let’s jump right in, shall we?</p>
<p>The Broken of Britain: <a href="http://thebrokenofbritain.blogspot.com/2010/11/gps-story-by-dr-jest.html">The GP’s Story by Dr Jest</a></p>
<blockquote><p>So there you have it. Neither Pete nor Dud would have chosen to be where they are now, and neither has asked not to work when they were capable. Indeed both have rather struggled on when reason would have suggested they ought not. And I could name you a dozen others in a similar position. All present talk of making it more profitable to work than rely on benefit may sound very noble and high minded in the marbled halls of power, where hard graft means having a lot to read and a few late meetings to go to. It completely misses the enormous efforts made by the likes of Pete and Dud to keep going against the odds, and any move to impoverish them is little short of scandalous and should be relentlessly pointed out for the evil narrow minded bigotry it is.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sarah at Cat in a Dog’s World: <a href="http://autisticcats.blogspot.com/2010/11/pwd-and-tsa.html">PWD and TSA</a></p>
<blockquote><p>From information I&#8217;d heard from TSA administrators, I thought that the body scanners would reducethe need for physical pat-downs. Little did I know that TSA would use the new technology as an excuse to conduct more invasive pat-downs! It is obscene, especially when one considers that many people with disabilities don&#8217;t have any &#8220;choice&#8221; at all. If someone is unable to stand independently for ten seconds with their arms up, or if one wears any number of medical devices or prostheses&#8230;there is no &#8220;choice.&#8221; (And no, for many people, &#8220;don&#8217;t fly&#8221; is not a realistic choice.) There is, additionally, reason for concern about the radiation from the body scanners, particularly for cancer survivors and people who have a genetic predisposition to cancer. It is now pretty clear that body scanners, far from being a panacea, are making things worse. And people with disabilities are being affected disproportionately.</p></blockquote>
<p>At Spilt Milk: <a href="http://mymilkspilt.wordpress.com/2010/12/22/thanks-for-your-help-doctor/">Thanks for your help, doctor.</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Make no mistake: I know that this only happened to me because I am fat. If I were a thin person and I walked through his door with the symptoms I described, he would have been forced to dig deeper. To ask me more questions, to hopefully come up with a wider range of options. Maybe run more tests.</p></blockquote>
<p>United States: Megan Cottrell at ChicagoNow: <a href="http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/chicago-muckrakers/2010/12/got-a-disability-youll-see-the-difference-in-your-paycheck.html">Got a disability? You&#8217;ll see the difference in your paycheck</a></p>
<blockquote><p>A lot of people might assume that if you have a disability, you might not make as much money as someone without a disability. But how much less? How hard is it for people with disabilities in Illinois to get by compared to their neighbors?</p></blockquote>
<p>India: An unnamed special correspondent at The Hindu: <a href="http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article934044.ece">Social barriers keep the disabled away from workforce</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Persons with disabilities are the last identity group to enter the workforce, not because their disability comes in the way of their functioning, but because of social and practical barriers that prevent them from joining work, a study on the ‘Employment Rights of Disabled Women in India&#8217; carried out by the Society for Disability and Rehabilitation of the National Commission for Women (NCW) has said.</p></blockquote>
<p>Guillermo Contreras at Chron.com: <a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/7348289.html">State sued over care for disabled Texans</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The federal lawsuit, filed Monday in San Antonio, alleges the state isn&#8217;t providing some mentally and physically disabled Texans the opportunity to move into community-based settings, which advocates say are less restrictive and more rehabilitative than nursing homes.</p></blockquote>
<p>Lastly, here&#8217;s a transcript of a story on Australia&#8217;s 7.30 Report program called <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2010/s3099772.htm">Setting Sail</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Known as the &#8216;Everest of sailing&#8217; the Sydney to Hobart race challenges the most seasoned of yachtsmen on what can be a treacherous ocean voyage.</p>
<p>Most of the focus is on the big maxi-yachts competing for line honours. But a unique crew of blind and deaf sailors is also commanding attention.</p>
<p>The charity organisation, Sailors With Disabilities, has been gifted a half-million dollar fast yacht, making them eligible for the first time in the prestigious Rolex Cup.</p></blockquote>
<p>Send your links to recreading[@]disabledfeminists[.]com. Let us know  if/how you want to be credited. And have yourself a fabulous weekend.</p>
<p>&copy;2012 <a href="http://disabledfeminists.com">FWD/Forward</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/24/recommended-reading-for-24-december-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recommended Reading for Thursday</title>
		<link>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/23/recommended-reading-for-thursday/</link>
		<comments>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/23/recommended-reading-for-thursday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[recommended reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carnival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deaf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disability blog carnival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ramps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheelchair ramp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabledfeminists.com/?p=4370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exciting Laptop update: I dropped it off at the repair place today. I will likely not get it back till after the holiday. Picture my face of woe. Woe. Lucky I can at least borrow Don&#8217;s laptop to check email and play Farmville. Right now I&#8217;m at my library, which closes at the horribly-early hour [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exciting Laptop update: I dropped it off at the repair place today.  I will likely not get it back till after the holiday.  Picture my face of woe.  Woe.  Lucky I can at least borrow Don&#8217;s laptop to check email <del>and play Farmville</del>.  Right now I&#8217;m at my library, which closes at the horribly-early hour of 6 p.m.  (Usually it closes at midnight.)</p>
<p>Yay! The newest Disability Blog Carnival is up at Rolling Around in my Head:<a href = "http://davehingsburger.blogspot.com/2010/12/long-nights-disability-blog-carnival.html">Long Nights: Disability Blog Carnival</a>!</p>
<blockquote><p>We’ve all had long dark nights. We’ve all learned, to greater and lesser degrees how to survive them. This Disability Blog Carnival comes on the Winter Solstice, the longest night of the year in the Northern Hemisphere. One can forget that in another part of the world, it is the day with most light. There is always balance. The submissions to the Carnival speak of strategies rather than solutions, realizations rather than remedies. I think that’s what makes them so compelling. I wrote my post the other day and realized how deep and how difficult it was to write about darkness. I applaud all who submitted and thank them for the many times I was moved, to tears, to thought and, perhaps even, to action. </p></blockquote>
<p>The next Disability Blog Carnival will be hosted by <a href = "http://candidlycrippled.blogspot.com/2010/12/hey-look-im-hosting-blog-carnival.html">Butterfly Dreams</a></p>
<blockquote><p>he theme I have chosen is LET YOUR FREAK FLAG FLY, taken from the title of a song in one of the Shrek movies, and one of my favorite songs of all time. Write about a time when you openly and proudly identified as a person with a disabilty, or, if you&#8217;re a non-disabled ally, write about a time when you were proud to stand by us. Or&#8230;.you could make it into a musing on the word &#8220;freak&#8221; itself, and related words. Do they help us? Hurt us? Is it wrong to call ourselves freaks, spazzes, and gimps? Or is it empowering? Or&#8230;&#8230;something else!! I&#8217;m flexible &#8211; as long as you can justify it fitting the theme, I&#8217;m good.</p></blockquote>
<p>Noelle Cigarroa Bell at Deaf Echo: <a href = "http://deafecho.com/2010/12/why-i-almost-didnt-sign-the-dailykos-petition/">Why I Almost Didn’t Sign The Dailykos Petition</a></p>
<blockquote><p>I was reluctant to sign the Dailykos petition in support of Netflix and asking the FCC to reign in Comcast’s abuse of corporate power. Why was I reluctant to do so? Because of the history of Netflix’s hostile business practices towards the deaf community, in refusing to caption streaming videos. Dana Mulvany, a consumer advocate, explains the history between Netflix and the deaf community, which I am a part of:</p>
<blockquote><p>Yet virtually all new DVDs and TV programs have captions or subtitles.   Why hasn’t Netflix figured out how to repurpose the captions and subtitles from DVDs more quickly for online streaming?  Hulu.com does this with a very short turn around period without even charging viewers.  Netflix has dragged its feet about doing this even when it’s raking in millions of dollars from its subscribers.  The problem seems to be one of attitude and will, not resources.</p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>Pipe Cleaner Dreams: <a href = "http://pipecleanerdreams.blogspot.com/2010/12/slip-sliding-away.html">Slip Sliding Away</a></p>
<blockquote><p>I need your help. This is the first year that we have had our wheelchair ramp and really needed to use it. It is Ronnie&#8217;s only access into the house.</p>
<p>Last week, we had our first snow. I was dreading it &#8211; not because I don&#8217;t like snow &#8211; I really love snow &#8211; but I knew that the ramp was going to be an issue. And sure enough, it was.</p>
<p>So here&#8217;s where I need the help. What do others of you that have ramps do when the ramps get snowy or icy?</p></blockquote>
<p>Wheelchair Dancer: <a href = "http://cripwheels.blogspot.com/2010/12/check-me-out.html">Check ME out!</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Not in that way, peeps.  Although if you absolutely must.  Smile.  This comes to me via a variety of folks, and I have enjoyed it so much that I thought I would add it to my blog.  It&#8217;s a neat, neat idea: How To Borrow A Person From The Library, by Liz Colville at the Hairpin.  The Toronto public library has this idea, taken from the library in Copenhagen &#8212; that people are just as cool as books and that you could just check out a person from the library.</p></blockquote>
<p>&copy;2012 <a href="http://disabledfeminists.com">FWD/Forward</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/23/recommended-reading-for-thursday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recommended Reading for Wednesday</title>
		<link>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/22/recommended-reading-for-wednesday/</link>
		<comments>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/22/recommended-reading-for-wednesday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[recommended reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accessible tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[childbirth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fucking meds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk uncuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabledfeminists.com/?p=4365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi All! My laptop is broken, woe, and thus I am more scattered than even the last month might lead you to believe. (Repair will take a few days, I haven&#8217;t lost anything important, and it won&#8217;t even cost much to fix, so don&#8217;t fret!) Hand to Mouth: Lilliput touchscreen monitor review: a pleasant surprise [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All! My laptop is broken, woe, and thus I am more scattered than even the last month might lead you to believe.  (Repair will take a few days, I haven&#8217;t lost anything important, and it won&#8217;t even cost much to fix, so don&#8217;t fret!)</p>
<p>Hand to Mouth: <a href = "http://hand2mouth.wordpress.com/2010/12/19/lilliput-touchscreen-monitor-review-a-pleasant-surprise/">Lilliput touchscreen monitor review: a pleasant surprise</a></p>
<blockquote><p>So. A friend of mine did the gambling for me, and surprised me with a 7” Lilliput touchscreen USB monitor. I am typing on it with the stylus taped to my fingers, because otherwise I lose my grip after a while and the pinching motion hurts.</p>
<p>If you want to use this device on something other than your home computer, be aware that the monitor requires driver installations for the device and the touchscreen capability. The disk includes drivers for 2000 through 7, 32 bit. Installation is straightforward, as is the touch calibration – you hold the stylus on 4 points until it says OK. You can also choose 9 or 25 points from the calibration menu later on, and there is also a draw test to determine accuracy. You do need some degree of fine motor control.</p></blockquote>
<p>Lisa J. Ellwood at UK Uncut: <a href = "http://www.ukuncut.org.uk/blog/disabled-activists">Guest post: Disabled Activists and the Anti-Cuts Movement</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Recent media coverage has shone the spotlight on disabled people, and that spotlight has been less than favourable. We are castigated as &#8216;scroungers<br />
and &#8216;fakers&#8217; not only by journalists and their employers, but also neighbours, friends and even family. It would seem that the vast majority of the great British public knows several people who are as fit as a fiddle and audaciously raking money in hand-over-fist thanks to bogus benefits claims based on faked illnesses. There is an endless stream of rhetoric to be found when reading any newspaper, blog or listening to talk radio. Too often I find myself reading the latest venomous shots fired by the disgruntled and wonder if the face behind the pseudonym is a familiar one.</p></blockquote>
<p>Musings of a Marfan Mom: <a href = "http://marfmom.com/archives/2824">Ellen&#8217;s Birth Story</a></p>
<blockquote><p>My husband and I decided to have biological children in spite of my genetic risk. During one of my first ob-gyn visits with my first pregnancy in 1999, I brought up delivery options. My bone disorder is rare, and medical professionals who don’t quite understand it can be overly cautious. I knew from my research that women with my type of OI (the most mild type) who have not had pelvic fractures or pelvic deformities can deliver babies vaginally. I was also familiar with research indicating that c-sections are not necessarily safer for babies who have OI. But I was afraid my doctors would freak out about a fragile mom delivering a potentially fragile baby and insist on a c-section. I was relieved when the doctors said they were fine with my planning a vaginal birth. I settled into my pregnancy, took childbirth classes, and looked forward to seeing what my body could do.</p></blockquote>
<p>Miss Invisible at Fucking Meds: <a href = "http://fucking-meds.dreamwidth.org/72723.html">Fun with benzos</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Dear Ativan,</p>
<p>You were first prescribed to me on an as-needed basis for panic attacks, and you were so good to me. Other meds often do awful things to my system, but the worst you ever did was knock me out, which was nice when I was, y&#8217;know, too panicked for rest. So it made sense for the pdoc to put me on you when I needed a day-to-day med. Just a tiny bit, just a quarter of a .5 mg tablet. Barely a dose at all.</p></blockquote>
<p>Astrid: <a href = "http://astridvanwoerkom.wordpress.com/2010/12/18/change-in-autism-symptoms-and-maladaptive-behavior-after-exiting-high-school/">Change in Autism Symptoms and Maladaptive Behavior after Exiting High School</a></p>
<blockquote><p>I’m not quite in the mood for studying. However, I thought that, since I’ve been nominated for best autism spectrum blogger in the Mental Nurse TWIM blog awards, I’d better do an autism post for a change. This time, I’m going to review a study on a subject that is dear to my heart: the effects of exiting high school on autism symptomatology and maladaptive behaviors in adolescents and young adults with ASD.</p></blockquote>
<p>&copy;2012 <a href="http://disabledfeminists.com">FWD/Forward</a>. All Rights Reserved.</p>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/12/22/recommended-reading-for-wednesday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

