<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AWP: &#8220;The Disabled&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/06/18/awp-the-disabled/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/06/18/awp-the-disabled/</link>
	<description>FWD (feminists with disabilities) for a way forward</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 17:29:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: QLH</title>
		<link>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/06/18/awp-the-disabled/#comment-12469</link>
		<dc:creator>QLH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 22:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabledfeminists.com/?p=3399#comment-12469</guid>
		<description>I really dislike any term for a group of people that doesn&#039;t include &quot;people&quot; in the term.  &quot;The Disabled&quot; sounds like &quot;The Obese,&quot; a horror movie villain.

&quot;People with disabilities,&quot; however, has &quot;people&quot; right there.  No one&#039;s humanity is erased.

I shudder every time I hear &quot;blacks,&quot; for example, instead of &quot;black people.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really dislike any term for a group of people that doesn&#8217;t include &#8220;people&#8221; in the term.  &#8220;The Disabled&#8221; sounds like &#8220;The Obese,&#8221; a horror movie villain.</p>
<p>&#8220;People with disabilities,&#8221; however, has &#8220;people&#8221; right there.  No one&#8217;s humanity is erased.</p>
<p>I shudder every time I hear &#8220;blacks,&#8221; for example, instead of &#8220;black people.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaitlyn</title>
		<link>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/06/18/awp-the-disabled/#comment-12429</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaitlyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 20:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabledfeminists.com/?p=3399#comment-12429</guid>
		<description>You know what&#039;s another annoying thing about &quot;the disabled&quot;? If someone is using that without thinking (like that book Sarah read - ugh!), they have an image of &quot;the disabled&quot; in their head, and it ain&#039;t me.

It&#039;s somebody with an &quot;obvious&quot; disability, someone you can look at it and know - someone who uses a wheelchair or a cane. The accessories make the disability.

Also, something physically obvious is easy to fix - look, we&#039;ve got braille (and noise with our fire alarm) and ramps! So the ramps are a mile out of the way, they&#039;re here.

&quot;The disabled&quot; also takes away the fact that we disagree about things related to disability and accessibility and language... and act like humans! Again with the de-humanization - we never speak for ourselves, we&#039;re always children.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what&#8217;s another annoying thing about &#8220;the disabled&#8221;? If someone is using that without thinking (like that book Sarah read &#8211; ugh!), they have an image of &#8220;the disabled&#8221; in their head, and it ain&#8217;t me.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s somebody with an &#8220;obvious&#8221; disability, someone you can look at it and know &#8211; someone who uses a wheelchair or a cane. The accessories make the disability.</p>
<p>Also, something physically obvious is easy to fix &#8211; look, we&#8217;ve got braille (and noise with our fire alarm) and ramps! So the ramps are a mile out of the way, they&#8217;re here.</p>
<p>&#8220;The disabled&#8221; also takes away the fact that we disagree about things related to disability and accessibility and language&#8230; and act like humans! Again with the de-humanization &#8211; we never speak for ourselves, we&#8217;re always children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrid</title>
		<link>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/06/18/awp-the-disabled/#comment-12426</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabledfeminists.com/?p=3399#comment-12426</guid>
		<description>I used to use &quot;the disabled&quot; as shorthand for &quot;people with disabilities&quot; occasionally, but have tried to correct myself when I caught myself doing this. Your post makes perfect sense on why &quot;the disabled&quot; is inappropriate use even when no attributions are made to what &quot;the disabled&quot; want or need or whatever and no stereotypes are used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to use &#8220;the disabled&#8221; as shorthand for &#8220;people with disabilities&#8221; occasionally, but have tried to correct myself when I caught myself doing this. Your post makes perfect sense on why &#8220;the disabled&#8221; is inappropriate use even when no attributions are made to what &#8220;the disabled&#8221; want or need or whatever and no stereotypes are used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/06/18/awp-the-disabled/#comment-12425</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabledfeminists.com/?p=3399#comment-12425</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post.  I have strongly negative reactions to hearing &quot;the disabled&quot; (and &quot;the [any oppressed group]&quot;), and this post really articulates why.  I&#039;ve also noticed that in many contexts, this usage is combined with words that make PWD out to be helpless and passive.  (Example: I recently read a book which talked about the ADA as a result of activism for &quot;advocates for the disabled.&quot;  Because apparently actual PWD had nothing to do with it!  Grrr.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post.  I have strongly negative reactions to hearing &#8220;the disabled&#8221; (and &#8220;the [any oppressed group]&#8220;), and this post really articulates why.  I&#8217;ve also noticed that in many contexts, this usage is combined with words that make PWD out to be helpless and passive.  (Example: I recently read a book which talked about the ADA as a result of activism for &#8220;advocates for the disabled.&#8221;  Because apparently actual PWD had nothing to do with it!  Grrr.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ang</title>
		<link>http://disabledfeminists.com/2010/06/18/awp-the-disabled/#comment-12424</link>
		<dc:creator>Ang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://disabledfeminists.com/?p=3399#comment-12424</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for this. I see &#039;the disabled&#039; all the time and you&#039;ve perfectly articulated why it bothers me so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for this. I see &#8216;the disabled&#8217; all the time and you&#8217;ve perfectly articulated why it bothers me so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

