10 responses to “Recommended Reading for October 19, 2009”

  1. meloukhia

    Everyone, truly, go read Marginalized folks shouldn’t always have to be the ‘bigger persons’, because it is extremely good, and oh so very true. I’m a big believer in catching flies with honey, but there’s a place and a time for that kind of thing.
    .-= meloukhia´s last blog ..Bones: A Night at the Bones Museum =-.

  2. codeman38

    Also on the student mental health note, people need to think about intersectionality of disabilities when it comes to mental health.

    Requiring a telephone intake before scheduling an appointment when there’s no TTY number and no alternative means of communication such as a secure web chat? Sorry, but I really don’t want to have to get a relay operator involved in that; it’d just make it worse for everyone involved, including the relay operator.

  3. codeman38

    The good news is that my university’s health center is holding a diversity panel this week to gather information from various minorities– including people with disabilities. Yeah, I’m bringing this and a few other related issues up. :)

  4. kaninchenzero

    It’s a good start. Here’s hoping they actually change things as a result, codeman38.

  5. annaham

    Wow, the “Marginalized Folks…” post is absolutely amazing. Should be required reading for some folks!
    .-= annaham´s last blog ..IIB v 1.0 =-.

  6. notthemarimba

    Loved the piece on mental health and colleges. My school has a pretty good counseling center, but housing is notoriously bad when it comes to any kind of mental health issues.

  7. Sara

    Great post, this is one of my favourite topics and close to my heart.LOL.
    I love keeping up to date on everything new so i’ll definitely be bookmarking this site.
    Keep up the great work! ;-)

  8. Katja

    Thanks for the link, and for turning me on to so many new blogs I was unaware of!

  9. codeman38

    Oh, I did bring the phone-intake issue up with the counseling center here– and it turns out it was an honest omission. Their policy, as it turns out, is to allow someone who’s uncomfortable on or unable to use the phone to have the intake screening done in-person instead, but there was no mention of this policy at all in any of the publicly available material from the center. They’ll be correcting this in the near future.

Subscribe without commenting